Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900 outperforms EPYC 7502P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900 is 1615 days newer than EPYC 7502P.
Advantages of EPYC 7502P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-14900 - 64 vs 32 threads
Advantages of Core i9-14900
- Performs up to 79% better in Counter-Strike 2 than EPYC 7502P - 583 vs 325 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7502P doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
583
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.05/FPS
100%
Price, €
€610.67
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €610.67 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8862 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
EPYC 7502P | vs | Core i9-14900 |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i9 |
Not Available | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 24 |
64 | Threads | 32 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
180 W | TDP | Not Available |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |