Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12600K outperforms EPYC 7413 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12600K is 234 days newer than EPYC 7413.
Advantages of EPYC 7413
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12600K - 48 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Core i5-12600K
- Performs up to 22% better in Minecraft than EPYC 7413 - 834 vs 685 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD EPYC 7413 - 125 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7413 doesn't have integrated graphics
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
EPYC 7413
Server/Workstation • Mar 15th, 2021
Core i5-12600K
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
EPYC 7413 | vs | Core i5-12600K |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 15th, 2021 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
| EPYC | Collection | Core i5 |
| Not Available | Codename | Alder Lake |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 10 |
48 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
| 180 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 26.5x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
