The EPYC 7401P is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i9-10900KF. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the EPYC 7401P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 48 vs 20 threads
Advantages of the Core i9-10900KF
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 26% less energy – 125 vs 170 Watts
EPYC 7401P vs Core i9-10900KF for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
EPYC 7401P
Jun 29th, 2017
Average FPS
173
90%
Min 1% FPS
116
91%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock
Core i9-10900KF
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
193
100%
Min 1% FPS
128
100%
Price, €
€586.77
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.04/FPS
100%
EPYC 7401P vs Core i9-10900KF in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The EPYC 7401P vs Core i9-10900KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The EPYC 7401P vs Core i9-10900KF in core CPU performance specifications
EPYC 7401P
Jun 29th, 2017
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
64 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
54%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
57%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
91%
Core i9-10900KF
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
10-core
42%
L3 Cache
20 MB
31%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
EPYC 7401P | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i9-10900KF |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 29th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $509.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
| Naples | Codename | Comet Lake |
| 170 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Performance | ||
24 | Cores | 10 |
48 | Threads | 20 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.7 GHz |
| 3.0 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 5.3 GHz |
64 MB | L3 Cache | 20 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 2666 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2933 MHz |
| No | Integrated Graphics | No |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
