Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900X outperforms EPYC 7302P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900X is 31 days older than EPYC 7302P.
Advantages of EPYC 7302P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 9 3900X - 32 vs 24 threads
Advantages of Ryzen 9 3900X
- Performs up to 2% better in Dishonored 2 than EPYC 7302P - 268 vs 264 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD EPYC 7302P - 105 vs 155 Watts
Dishonored 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
EPYC 7302P
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Ryzen 9 3900X
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
EPYC 7302P | vs | Ryzen 9 3900X |
|---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| EPYC | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Rome | Codename | Matisse |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 12 |
32 | Threads | 24 |
| 3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
| 155 W | TDP | 105 W |
| 7 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 30.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
