In Battlefield 6, the Core i9-9900T is slower than the Ryzen 9 5900X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-9900T
- Consumes up to 67% less energy – 35 vs 105 Watts
- Consumes up to 67% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Ryzen 9 5900X
- Up to 30% faster in Battlefield 6 – 104 vs 80 FPS
- Up to 30% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 1 year and 6 months newer – Nov 05, 2020 vs Apr 23, 2019
- Is 1 year and 6 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i9-9900T vs Ryzen 9 5900X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen 9 5900X
Nov 5th, 2020
Average FPS
104 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
78 FPS
100%
Price, $
$269
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.58/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-9900T vs Ryzen 9 5900X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-9900T vs Ryzen 9 5900X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-9900T
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
67%
L3 Cache
16 MB
25%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
57%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
92%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
83%
Ryzen 9 5900X
Nov 5th, 2020
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
64 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-9900T Apr 23rd, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 9 5900X Nov 5th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 23rd, 2019 | Released | Nov 5th, 2020 |
$423.00 | MSRP | $549.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | AM4 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 105 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
