Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 3600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 3600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 1563 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 3600.
Advantages of Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 43% better in Starfield than Ryzen 5 3600 - 87 vs 61 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3600 - 32 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Ryzen 5 3600
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i9-14900KF - €85.00 vs €485.00
- Up to 75% better value when playing Starfield than Core i9-14900KF - €1.39 vs €5.57 per FPS
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €485 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 146 minutes ago
Buy for €85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 147 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-14900KF | vs | Ryzen 5 3600 |
---|---|---|
Oct 17th, 2023 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |