Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-13700F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-13700F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 286 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-13700F.
Advantages of Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 9% better in Rust than Core i7-13700F - 276 vs 254 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-13700F - 32 vs 24 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-13700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i7-13700F
- Up to 27% cheaper than Core i9-14900K - €367.95 vs €504.41
- Up to 21% better value when playing Rust than Core i9-14900K - €1.45 vs €1.83 per FPS
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
276
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.83/FPS
79%
Price, €
€504.41
72%
FPS Winner
Buy for €504.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 155 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
254
92%
Value, €/FPS
€1.45/FPS
100%
Price, €
€367.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €367.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 155 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-14900K | vs | Core i7-13700F |
---|---|---|
Oct 17th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 16 |
32 | Threads | 24 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |