Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms the cheaper Core i9-12900KF on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-12900KF is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 795 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-12900KF.
Advantages of Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 6% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i9-12900KF - 216 vs 203 FPS
Advantages of Core i9-12900KF
- Up to 47% cheaper than Core i9-14900F - €357.63 vs €679.99
- Up to 44% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i9-14900F - €1.76 vs €3.15 per FPS
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
216
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.15/FPS
56%
Price, €
€679.99
52%
FPS Winner
Buy for €679.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 254 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
203
94%
Value, €/FPS
€1.76/FPS
100%
Price, €
€357.63
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €357.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 254 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-14900F | vs | Core i9-12900KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 16 |
32 | Threads | 24 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |