The Core i9-14900F is at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the Core i7-4820K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i9-14900F
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of the Core i7-4820K
The Core i9-14900F is better in every way
Core i9-14900F vs Core i7-4820K for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i9-14900F
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
218
100%
Min 1% FPS
143
100%
Price, €
€612.36
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.8/FPS
100%
Core i7-4820K
Sep 1st, 2013
Average FPS
171
78%
Min 1% FPS
115
80%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i9-14900F vs Core i7-4820K in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-14900F vs Core i7-4820K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-14900F vs Core i7-4820K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-14900F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
54%
Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Core i7-4820K
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
10 MB
28%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
67%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i9-14900F | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i7-4820K |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
$524.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge E |
Not Available | Power Consumption | 130 W |
Performance | ||
24 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
2.0 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.7 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.9 GHz |
36 MB | L3 Cache | 10 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 5600 MHz | RAM | DDR3 |
No | Integrated Graphics | No |
No | Overclockable | Yes |