Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-11700F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-11700F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 1028 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-11700F.
Advantages of Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 12% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-11700F - 216 vs 192 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-11700F - 32 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Core i7-11700F
- Up to 48% cheaper than Core i9-14900F - €319.38 vs €612.36
- Up to 42% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i9-14900F - €1.66 vs €2.84 per FPS
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
216
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.84/FPS
58%
Price, €
€612.36
52%
FPS Winner
Buy for €612.36 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 362 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
192
89%
Value, €/FPS
€1.66/FPS
100%
Price, €
€319.38
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €319.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 363 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-14900F | vs | Core i7-11700F |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |