Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-12400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-12400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 734 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-12400F.
Advantages of Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 9% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i5-12400F - 196 vs 180 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12400F - 32 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Core i5-12400F
- Up to 78% cheaper than Core i9-14900F - €148.74 vs €679.99
- Up to 76% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i9-14900F - €0.83 vs €3.47 per FPS
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
196
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.47/FPS
24%
Price, €
€679.99
21%
FPS Winner
Buy for €679.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
180
92%
Value, €/FPS
€0.83/FPS
100%
Price, €
€148.74
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €148.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-14900F | vs | Core i5-12400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |