Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-12100F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-12100F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 713 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-12100F.
Advantages of Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 10% better in Alan Wake 2 than Core i3-12100F - 139 vs 126 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-12100F - 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Core i3-12100F
- Up to 88% cheaper than Core i9-14900F - €81.33 vs €679.99
- Up to 87% better value when playing Alan Wake 2 than Core i9-14900F - €0.65 vs €4.89 per FPS
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
139
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.89/FPS
13%
Price, €
€679.99
11%
FPS Winner
Buy for €679.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 231 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
126
91%
Value, €/FPS
€0.65/FPS
100%
Price, €
€81.33
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €81.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 232 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-14900F | vs | Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 58 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |