Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 3400G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 3400G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900 is 1646 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 3400G.
Advantages of Core i9-14900
- Performs up to 21% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 5 3400G - 221 vs 182 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3400G - 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Ryzen 5 3400G
- Up to 86% cheaper than Core i9-14900 - €88.99 vs €641.35
- Up to 83% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-14900 - €0.49 vs €2.90 per FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €641.35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 353 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
182
82%
Value, €/FPS
€0.49/FPS
100%
Price, €
€88.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €88.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 354 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-14900 | vs | Ryzen 5 3400G |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |