Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-14700F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-14700F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900 and the cheaper Core i7-14700F have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Core i9-14900
- Performs up to 1% better in Battlefield 1 than Core i7-14700F - 263 vs 261 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-14700F - 32 vs 28 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-14700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i7-14700F
- Up to 39% cheaper than Core i9-14900 - €373.04 vs €607.75
- Up to 38% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Core i9-14900 - €1.43 vs €2.31 per FPS
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €607.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 396 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
261
99%
Value, €/FPS
€1.43/FPS
100%
Price, €
€373.04
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €373.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 396 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-14900 | vs | Core i7-14700F |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 20 |
32 | Threads | 28 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |