Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 7 8700G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 7 8700G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 361 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 7 8700G.
Advantages of Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 2% better in Battlefield 1 than Ryzen 7 8700G - 265 vs 259 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 8700G - 32 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Ryzen 7 8700G
- Up to 45% cheaper than Core i9-13900KS - €302.57 vs €553.99
- Up to 44% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Core i9-13900KS - €1.17 vs €2.09 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 65 vs 150 Watts
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
FPS
265
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.09/FPS
56%
Price, €
€553.99
54%
FPS Winner
Buy for €553.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 319 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
259
98%
Value, €/FPS
€1.17/FPS
100%
Price, €
€302.57
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €302.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 319 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-13900KS | vs | Ryzen 7 8700G |
---|---|---|
Jan 12th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Not Available |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
150 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 4 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 780M |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |