Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i7-10700F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-10700F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 880 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-10700F.
Advantages of Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 2% better in Control than Core i7-10700F - 208 vs 203 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-10700F - 32 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Core i7-10700F
- Up to 24% cheaper than Core i9-13900KF - €402.59 vs €528.74
- Up to 22% better value when playing Control than Core i9-13900KF - €1.98 vs €2.54 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
208
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.54/FPS
78%
Price, €
€528.74
76%
FPS Winner
Buy for €528.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 740 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
203
98%
Value, €/FPS
€1.98/FPS
100%
Price, €
€402.59
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €402.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 741 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-13900KF | vs | Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |