Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms the cheaper Core i9-11900F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-11900F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 560 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-11900F.
Advantages of Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 9% better in Overwatch 2 than Core i9-11900F - 412 vs 377 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-11900F - 32 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i9-11900F
- Up to 32% cheaper than Core i9-13900K - €363.14 vs €534.60
- Up to 26% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Core i9-13900K - €0.96 vs €1.30 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for €534.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1844 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
377
92%
Value, €/FPS
€0.96/FPS
100%
Price, €
€363.14
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €363.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1844 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-13900K | vs | Core i9-11900F |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |