Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-11400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-11400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 560 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-11400F.
Advantages of Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 12% better in Overwatch 2 than Core i5-11400F - 412 vs 369 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11400F - 32 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-11400F
- Up to 71% cheaper than Core i9-13900K - €154.49 vs €533.00
- Up to 67% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Core i9-13900K - €0.42 vs €1.29 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for €533 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 406 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
369
90%
Value, €/FPS
€0.42/FPS
100%
Price, €
€154.49
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €154.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 406 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-13900K | vs | Core i5-11400F |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |