In Battlefield 6, the Core i9-13900F is much faster than the Ryzen 5 3600. However, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $457 more expensive!
Core i9-13900F
- Up to 53% faster in Battlefield 6 – 127 vs 83 FPS
- Up to 53% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 3 years and 5 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Jul 07, 2019
- Is 3 years and 5 months newer
Ryzen 5 3600
- Up to 86% cheaper – $73.25 vs $529.95
- Up to 86% cheaper
- Up to 79% better value in Battlefield 6 – $0.88 vs $4.17/FPS
- Up to 79% better value in Battlefield 6
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i9-13900F vs Ryzen 5 3600: Comparison of performance and price
Core i9-13900F
Jan 4th, 2023
Average FPS
127 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
95 FPS
100%
Price, $
$529.95
13%
Value, $/FPS
$4.17/FPS
21%
Ryzen 5 3600
Jul 7th, 2019
Average FPS
83 FPS
65%
Min 1% FPS
62 FPS
65%
Price, $
$73.25
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.88/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-13900F vs Ryzen 5 3600 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-13900F vs Ryzen 5 3600 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-13900F
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
56%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Ryzen 5 3600
Jul 7th, 2019
Cores
6-core
25%
L3 Cache
32 MB
89%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
75%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
57%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-13900F Jan 4th, 2023 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 5 3600 Jul 7th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 4th, 2023 | Released | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| $524.00 | MSRP | $199.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1700 | Socket | AM4 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
