Core i9-13900F vs Core i3-4150 in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
The Core i9-13900F is at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the Core i3-4150. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i9-13900F
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of the Core i3-4150
- Consumes up to 17% less energy – 54 vs 65 Watts
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU as it has integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 FPS Calculator
The CPU's performance with selected game settings
Core i9-13900F
Jan 4th, 2023
Average FPS
237
100%
Min 1% FPS
161
100%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i3-4150
May 1st, 2014
Average FPS
195
82%
Min 1% FPS
134
83%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-13900F vs Core i3-4150 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-13900F vs Core i3-4150 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-13900F
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
57%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Core i3-4150
May 1st, 2014
Cores
2-core
8%
L3 Cache
3 MB
8%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
29%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-13900F | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-4150 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
| $524.00 | MSRP | $117.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 54 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 5600 MHz | RAM | DDR3 @ 1600 MHz |
| No | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
