The Core i9-13900 is at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the Core i5-8500, however, it's a slightly worse value for money, as it's €276.98 more expensive!
Advantages of the Core i9-13900
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 32 vs 6 threads
Advantages of the Core i5-8500
- Up to 57% cheaper – €212.00 vs €488.98
- A slightly better value for money for gaming
Core i9-13900 vs Core i5-8500 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i9-13900
Jan 4th, 2023
Average FPS
215
100%
Min 1% FPS
141
100%
Price, €
€488.98
43%
Value, €/FPS
€2.27/FPS
50%
Core i5-8500
Feb 14th, 2018
Average FPS
186
87%
Min 1% FPS
123
87%
Price, €
€212
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.13/FPS
100%
Core i9-13900 vs Core i5-8500 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-13900 vs Core i5-8500 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-13900 vs Core i5-8500 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-13900
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
67%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Core i5-8500
Feb 14th, 2018
Cores
6-core
25%
L3 Cache
9 MB
25%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
73%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
48%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i9-13900 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i5-8500 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Feb 14th, 2018 |
$549.00 | MSRP | $192.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
65 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
Performance | ||
24 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 6 |
2.0 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.0 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.1 GHz |
36 MB | L3 Cache | 9 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 5600 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2666 MHz |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |