Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-13400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-13400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900 and the cheaper Core i5-13400F have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Core i9-13900
- Performs up to 12% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i5-13400F - 549 vs 488 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-13400F - 32 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Up to 69% cheaper than Core i9-13900 - €157.00 vs €499.19
- Up to 65% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i9-13900 - €0.32 vs €0.91 per FPS
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €499.19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 240 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
488
89%
Value, €/FPS
€0.32/FPS
100%
Price, €
€157
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €157 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 240 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-13900 | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 10 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |