Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900K is 553 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10400F.
Advantages of Core i9-12900K
- Performs up to 25% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i5-10400F - 261 vs 209 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400F - 24 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-10400F
- Up to 52% cheaper than Core i9-12900K - €200.00 vs €419.99
- Up to 40% better value when playing Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i9-12900K - €0.96 vs €1.61 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
261
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.61/FPS
60%
Price, €
€419.99
47%
FPS Winner
Buy for €419.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1606 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
209
80%
Value, €/FPS
€0.96/FPS
100%
Price, €
€200
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €200 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1331 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-12900K | vs | Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Nov 4th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 6 |
24 | Threads | 12 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |