Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-10700F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-10700F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900F is 614 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-10700F.
Advantages of Core i9-12900F
- Performs up to 13% better in Battlefield V than Core i7-10700F - 279 vs 246 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-10700F - 24 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Core i7-10700F
- Up to 42% cheaper than Core i9-12900F - €258.88 vs €444.28
- Up to 34% better value when playing Battlefield V than Core i9-12900F - €1.05 vs €1.59 per FPS
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
279
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.59/FPS
66%
Price, €
€444.28
58%
FPS Winner
Buy for €444.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 262 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
246
88%
Value, €/FPS
€1.05/FPS
100%
Price, €
€258.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €258.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 263 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-12900F | vs | Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 16 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |