Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-10700F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-10700F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900 is 614 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-10700F.
Advantages of Core i9-12900
- Performs up to 8% better in Ready or Not than Core i7-10700F - 294 vs 272 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-10700F - 24 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i7-10700F
- Up to 34% cheaper than Core i9-12900 - €317.32 vs €479.99
- Up to 28% better value when playing Ready or Not than Core i9-12900 - €1.17 vs €1.63 per FPS
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for €479.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1372 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
272
93%
Value, €/FPS
€1.17/FPS
100%
Price, €
€317.32
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €317.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1372 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-12900 | vs | Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 16 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |