Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-12100F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-12100F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900KF is 315 days older than the cheaper Core i3-12100F.
Advantages of Core i9-11900KF
- Performs up to 1% better in Resident Evil 4 than Core i3-12100F - 198 vs 196 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-12100F - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Core i3-12100F
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i9-11900KF - €87.90 vs €531.48
- Up to 83% better value when playing Resident Evil 4 than Core i9-11900KF - €0.45 vs €2.68 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900KF - 58 vs 125 Watts
Resident Evil 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
198
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.68/FPS
17%
Price, €
€531.48
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for €531.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6932 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
196
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.45/FPS
100%
Price, €
€87.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €87.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6932 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-11900KF | vs | Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 58 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |