Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900KF is 320 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10100.
Advantages of Core i9-11900KF
- Performs up to 8% better in God of War than Core i3-10100 - 188 vs 174 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10100 - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Core i3-10100
- Up to 76% cheaper than Core i9-11900KF - €98.85 vs €408.66
- Up to 74% better value when playing God of War than Core i9-11900KF - €0.57 vs €2.17 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900KF - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
188
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.17/FPS
26%
Price, €
€408.66
24%
FPS Winner
Buy for €408.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 264 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
174
93%
Value, €/FPS
€0.57/FPS
100%
Price, €
€98.85
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €98.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 262 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-11900KF | vs | Core i3-10100 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |