Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i9-11900K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-11900K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 560 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-11900K.
Advantages of Core i9-11900K
- Up to 27% cheaper than Core i9-13900KF - €349.90 vs €480.04
- Up to 23% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-13900KF - €1.67 vs €2.16 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 6% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-11900K - 222 vs 209 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-11900K - 32 vs 16 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
209
94%
Value, €/FPS
€1.67/FPS
100%
Price, €
€349.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €349.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4909 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
222
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.16/FPS
77%
Price, €
€480.04
72%
FPS Winner
Buy for €480.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4909 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-11900K | vs | Core i9-13900KF |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 24 |
16 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |