Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3770 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3770 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900F is 3243 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3770.
Advantages of Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 13% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i7-3770 - 313 vs 278 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i7-3770 - 65 vs 77 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770 - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Core i7-3770
- Up to 45% cheaper than Core i9-11900F - €152.66 vs €276.66
- Up to 37% better value when playing PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i9-11900F - €0.55 vs €0.88 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900F doesn't have integrated graphics
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
313
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.88/FPS
62%
Price, €
€276.66
55%
FPS Winner
Buy for €276.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 454 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
278
89%
Value, €/FPS
€0.55/FPS
100%
Price, €
€152.66
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €152.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 453 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-11900F | vs | Core i7-3770 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 77 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
No | Overclockable | No |