Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10920X outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10920X is 800 days newer than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of Core i9-10920X
- Performs up to 4% better in Deathloop than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 181 vs 174 FPS
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 165 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10920X - 32 vs 24 threads
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
181
100%
Value, €/FPS
€6.06/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1097.4
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,097.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 377 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-10920X | vs | Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2019 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Cascade Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 16 |
24 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |