Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-12400 outperforms the more expensive Core i9-10900F on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-12400 is 614 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-10900F.
Advantages of Core i9-10900F
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12400 - 20 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Core i5-12400
- Performs up to 5% better in Remnant II than Core i9-10900F - 96 vs 91 FPS
- Up to 57% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - €164.13 vs €383.63
- Up to 59% better value when playing Remnant II than Core i9-10900F - €1.71 vs €4.22 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €383.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 245 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
96
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.71/FPS
100%
Price, €
€164.13
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €164.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 245 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-10900F | vs | Core i5-12400 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 6 |
20 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
No | Overclockable | No |