In Battlefield 6, the Core i9-10900 is quite a bit slower than the Core i7-13700KF. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-10900
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 48% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-13700KF
- Up to 47% faster in Battlefield 6 – 129 vs 88 FPS
- Up to 47% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 2 years and 4 months newer – Sep 27, 2022 vs Apr 30, 2020
- Is 2 years and 4 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i9-10900 vs Core i7-13700KF: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i7-13700KF
Sep 27th, 2022
Average FPS
129 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
97 FPS
100%
Price, $
$582.72
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.51/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-10900 vs Core i7-13700KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-10900 vs Core i7-13700KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-10900
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
10-core
62%
L3 Cache
20 MB
67%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
82%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
96%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
52%
Core i7-13700KF
Sep 27th, 2022
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-10900 Apr 30th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-13700KF Sep 27th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 30th, 2020 | Released | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| $483.00 | MSRP | $384.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1700 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2933 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
