In Battlefield 6, the Core i9-10900 is slower than the Core i7-12700K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-10900
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 48% less energy
Core i7-12700K
- Up to 32% faster in Battlefield 6 – 116 vs 88 FPS
- Up to 32% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 1 year and 6 months newer – Nov 04, 2021 vs Apr 30, 2020
- Is 1 year and 6 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i9-10900 vs Core i7-12700K: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-10900 vs Core i7-12700K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-10900 vs Core i7-12700K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-10900
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
10-core
83%
L3 Cache
20 MB
80%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
78%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
61%
Core i7-12700K
Nov 4th, 2021
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
25 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5 GHz
96%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-10900 Apr 30th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-12700K Nov 4th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 30th, 2020 | Released | Nov 4th, 2021 |
| $483.00 | MSRP | $409.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1700 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2933 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
