Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-13400F outperforms the more expensive Core i9-10850K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-13400F is 891 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-10850K.
Advantages of Core i9-10850K
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-13400F - 20 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 5% better in Elden Ring than Core i9-10850K - 131 vs 125 FPS
- Up to 44% cheaper than Core i9-10850K - €157.00 vs €279.99
- Up to 46% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i9-10850K - €1.20 vs €2.24 per FPS
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for €279.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 55 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
131
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.2/FPS
100%
Price, €
€157
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €157 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 54 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-10850K | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Jul 27th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 10 |
20 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |