Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-12400F outperforms the more expensive Core i9-10850K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-12400F is 526 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-10850K.
Advantages of Core i9-10850K
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12400F - 20 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-12400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-12400F
- Performs up to 4% better in God of War than Core i9-10850K - 186 vs 179 FPS
- Up to 72% cheaper than Core i9-10850K - €150.48 vs €541.71
- Up to 73% better value when playing God of War than Core i9-10850K - €0.81 vs €3.03 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-10850K - 65 vs 125 Watts
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €541.71 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 338 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
186
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.81/FPS
100%
Price, €
€150.48
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €150.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 338 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-10850K | vs | Core i5-12400F |
---|---|---|
Jul 27th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 6 |
20 | Threads | 12 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |