In Battlefield 6, the Core i7-9750HF is slightly faster than the Ryzen 3 3200G. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-9750HF
- Up to 12% faster in Battlefield 6 – 76 vs 68 FPS
- Up to 12% faster in Battlefield 6
- Consumes up to 31% less energy – 45 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 31% less energy
Ryzen 3 3200G
- Is 2 months and 14 days newer – Jul 07, 2019 vs Apr 23, 2019
- Is 2 months and 14 days newer
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i7-9750HF vs Ryzen 3 3200G: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen 3 3200G
Jul 7th, 2019
Average FPS
68 FPS
89%
Min 1% FPS
51 FPS
89%
Price, $
$65.98
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.97/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-9750HF vs Ryzen 3 3200G in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-9750HF vs Ryzen 3 3200G in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-9750HF
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
72%
Turbo Frequency
4.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Ryzen 3 3200G
Jul 7th, 2019
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
4 MB
33%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
89%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-9750HF Apr 23rd, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 3 3200G Jul 7th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 23rd, 2019 | Released | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | AM4 |
45 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR4 |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Radeon Vega 8 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
