In Battlefield 6, the Core i7-9750HF is slower than the Core i9-10850K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-9750HF
- Consumes up to 64% less energy – 45 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 64% less energy
Core i9-10850K
- Up to 19% faster in Battlefield 6 – 89 vs 75 FPS
- Up to 19% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 1 year and 3 months newer – Jul 27, 2020 vs Apr 23, 2019
- Is 1 year and 3 months newer
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i7-9750HF vs Core i9-10850K: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-9750HF vs Core i9-10850K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-9750HF vs Core i9-10850K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-9750HF
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
6-core
60%
L3 Cache
12 MB
60%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
72%
Turbo Frequency
4.5 GHz
87%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
91%
Core i9-10850K
Jul 27th, 2020
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-9750HF Apr 23rd, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-10850K Jul 27th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 23rd, 2019 | Released | Jul 27th, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | LGA1200 |
45 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
