Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-10700F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-10700F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9700K is 559 days older than the cheaper Core i7-10700F.
Advantages of Core i7-9700K
- Performs up to 2% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i7-10700F - 401 vs 393 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i7-10700F
- Up to 22% cheaper than Core i7-9700K - €317.32 vs €404.56
- Up to 20% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i7-9700K - €0.81 vs €1.01 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-9700K - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-9700K - 16 vs 8 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
401
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.01/FPS
80%
Price, €
€404.56
78%
FPS Winner
Buy for €404.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4745 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
393
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.81/FPS
100%
Price, €
€317.32
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €317.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4745 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-9700K | vs | Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |