Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-12900K outperforms the more expensive Core i7-9700F on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-12900K is 926 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-9700F.
Advantages of Core i7-9700F
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i9-12900K
- Performs up to 29% better in Dirt 5 than Core i7-9700F - 243 vs 188 FPS
- Up to 0% cheaper than Core i7-9700F - €419.99 vs €420.42
- Up to 23% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Core i7-9700F - €1.73 vs €2.24 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-9700F - 24 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-9700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €420.42 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6960 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
243
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.73/FPS
100%
Price, €
€419.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €419.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7234 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-9700F | vs | Core i9-12900K |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |