Buy on Amazon
€433.7
In Stock
Prices and StockMSRP $333
Prices and Stock
MSRP $333
Prices and StockMSRP $547
Prices and Stock
MSRP $547
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-10900K outperforms the more expensive Core i7-9700F on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-10900K is 373 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-9700F.
Advantages of Core i7-9700F
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 3% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-9700F - 137 vs 133 FPS
- Up to 28% cheaper than Core i7-9700F - €310.97 vs €433.70
- Up to 30% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-9700F - €2.27 vs €3.26 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-9700F - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-9700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Intel Core i7-9700F - Processore desktop 8 Core fino a 4,7 GHz senza processore grafico LGA1151 300 Series 65W
Buy for €433.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 316 minutes ago
Core i9-10900K
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
137
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.27/FPS
100%
Price, €
€310.97
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i9-10900K processor 3.7 GHz 20 MB Smart Cache Box
Buy for €310.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 316 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i7-9700F
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Core i9-10900K
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-9700F | vs | Core i9-10900K |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 10 |
| 8 | Threads | 20 |
| 3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 30.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Popular Core i7-9700F and Core i9-10900K Comparisons
Compare 2 Processors in Games
Core i9-10900K
€310.97
vs
Ryzen 9 7900X
€366.57
Core i9-10900K
€310.97
vs
Core i9-12900K
€382.37
Core i9-10900K
€310.97
vs
Ryzen 9 7950X
€520
Core i9-10900K
€310.97
vs
Core i9-14900KF
€460.27
Core i9-10900K
€310.97
vs
Core i7-13700K
€435.66
Core i9-10900K
€310.97
vs
Core i9-12900KF
€334.95
Core i9-10900K
€310.97
vs
Core i7-14700KF
€427.85
Core i9-10900K
€310.97
vs
Core i7-14700K
€386.43
Core i9-10900K
€310.97
vs
Core i9-14900K
€469.22
Core i9-10900K
€310.97
vs
Core i7-9700K
€400.97
Core i7-9700F
€433.7
vs
Ryzen 7 7700X
€303.15
Core i7-9700F
€433.7
vs
Ryzen 5 7600X
€238.99
Core i7-9700F
€433.7
vs
Ryzen 7 5700X3D
€275.99
Core i7-9700F
€433.7
vs
Ryzen 9 7900X
€366.57
Core i7-9700F
€433.7
vs
Ryzen 9 5900X
€265
Core i7-9700F
€433.7
vs
Core i9-12900K
€382.37
Core i7-9700F
€433.7
vs
Core i7-12700K
€240.18
Core i7-9700F
€433.7
vs
Ryzen 9 5950X
€330
Core i7-9700F
€433.7
vs
Core i7-12700KF
€218.72
Core i7-9700F
€433.7
vs
Core i7-13700KF
€299