In Battlefield 6, the Core i7-920 is much slower than the Ryzen 9 7950X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-920
- Consumes up to 24% less energy – 130 vs 170 Watts
- Consumes up to 24% less energy
Ryzen 9 7950X
- Up to 111% faster in Battlefield 6 – 129 vs 61 FPS
- Up to 111% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 13 years and 10 months newer – Sep 27, 2022 vs Nov 17, 2008
- Is 13 years and 10 months newer
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i7-920 vs Ryzen 9 7950X: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-920
Nov 17th, 2008
Average FPS
61 FPS
47%
Min 1% FPS
46 FPS
47%
Price, $
$76.76
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.25/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-920 vs Ryzen 9 7950X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-920 vs Ryzen 9 7950X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-920
Nov 17th, 2008
Cores
4-core
25%
L3 Cache
8 MB
12%
Base Frequency
2.666 GHz
59%
Turbo Frequency
2.933 GHz
51%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 9 7950X
Sep 27th, 2022
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
64 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-920 Nov 17th, 2008 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 9 7950X Sep 27th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Nov 17th, 2008 | Released | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $699.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1366 | Socket | AM5 |
130 W | Power Consumption | 170 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 5200 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Radeon Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
