The Core i7-870 is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i9-10900F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i7-870
The Core i9-10900F is better in every way
Advantages of the Core i9-10900F
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 20 vs 8 threads
Core i7-870 vs Core i9-10900F for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-870
Sep 8th, 2009
Average FPS
167
87%
Min 1% FPS
113
89%
Price, €
€56.31
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.33/FPS
100%
Core i9-10900F
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
192
100%
Min 1% FPS
127
100%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i7-870 vs Core i9-10900F in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-870 vs Core i9-10900F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-870 vs Core i9-10900F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-870
Sep 8th, 2009
Cores
4-core
40%
L3 Cache
8 MB
40%
Base Frequency
2.93 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
69%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-10900F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
96%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-870 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Sep 8th, 2009 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Not Available | MSRP | $464.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Lynnfield | Codename | Comet Lake |
95 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
Performance | ||
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
2.9 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.8 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 5.2 GHz |
8 MB | L3 Cache | 20 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR3 | RAM | DDR4 @ 2933 MHz |
No | Integrated Graphics | No |
No | Overclockable | No |