The Core i7-840QM is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i9-13900. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i7-840QM
- Consumes up to 31% less energy – 45 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of the Core i9-13900
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 32 vs 8 threads
Core i7-840QM vs Core i9-13900 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-840QM
Jun 20th, 2010
Average FPS
166
77%
Min 1% FPS
112
79%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock
Core i9-13900
Jan 4th, 2023
Average FPS
215
100%
Min 1% FPS
141
100%
Price, €
€494.99
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.3/FPS
100%
Core i7-840QM vs Core i9-13900 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-840QM vs Core i9-13900 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-840QM vs Core i9-13900 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-840QM
Jun 20th, 2010
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
8 MB
22%
Base Frequency
1.87 GHz
94%
Turbo Frequency
3.2 GHz
57%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
24%
Core i9-13900
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-840QM | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i9-13900 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Jun 20th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
$568.00 | MSRP | $549.00 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Clarksfield | Codename | Raptor Lake |
45 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
Performance | ||
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
1.9 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.0 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 5.6 GHz |
8 MB | L3 Cache | 36 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR3 @ 1333 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 5600 MHz |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |