Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms the more expensive Core i7-7820X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 9 5900X is 1228 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-7820X.
Advantages of Ryzen 9 5900X
- Performs up to 11% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-7820X - 146 vs 131 FPS
- Up to 62% cheaper than Core i7-7820X - €242.21 vs €641.79
- Up to 66% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-7820X - €1.66 vs €4.90 per FPS
- Consumes up to 25% less energy than Intel Core i7-7820X - 105 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-7820X - 24 vs 16 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for €641.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 79 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
146
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.66/FPS
100%
Price, €
€242.21
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €242.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 79 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-7820X | vs | Ryzen 9 5900X |
---|---|---|
Jun 26th, 2017 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Skylake-E/EP | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 12 |
16 | Threads | 24 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |