In Battlefield 6, the Core i7-7820X is slightly slower than the Ryzen 9 3900XT and it's also a worse value for money, as it's $53 more expensive!
Core i7-7820X
No clear advantages
Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Up to 14% faster in Battlefield 6 – 90 vs 79 FPS
- Up to 14% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 3 years and 11 days newer – Jul 07, 2020 vs Jun 26, 2017
- Is 3 years and 11 days newer
- Up to 12% cheaper – $389.99 vs $443.02
- Up to 12% cheaper
- Up to 23% better value in Battlefield 6 – $4.33 vs $5.60/FPS
- Up to 23% better value in Battlefield 6
- Consumes up to 25% less energy – 105 vs 140 Watts
- Consumes up to 25% less energy
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i7-7820X vs Ryzen 9 3900XT: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-7820X
Jun 26th, 2017
Average FPS
79 FPS
88%
Min 1% FPS
59 FPS
87%
Price, $
$443.02
88%
Value, $/FPS
$5.6/FPS
77%
Ryzen 9 3900XT
Jul 7th, 2020
Average FPS
90 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
68 FPS
100%
Price, $
$389.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.33/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-7820X vs Ryzen 9 3900XT in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-7820X vs Ryzen 9 3900XT in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-7820X
Jun 26th, 2017
Cores
8-core
67%
L3 Cache
11 MB
17%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
92%
Turbo Frequency
4.5 GHz
96%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
83%
Ryzen 9 3900XT
Jul 7th, 2020
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
64 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-7820X Jun 26th, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 9 3900XT Jul 7th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 26th, 2017 | Released | Jul 7th, 2020 |
| $599.00 | MSRP | $499.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2066 | Socket | AM4 |
| 140 W | Power Consumption | 105 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
