Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-13900K outperforms the more expensive Core i7-7820X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-13900K is 1919 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-7820X.
Advantages of Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 13% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i7-7820X - 199 vs 176 FPS
- Up to 14% cheaper than Core i7-7820X - €534.60 vs €622.15
- Up to 24% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i7-7820X - €2.69 vs €3.53 per FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Core i7-7820X - 125 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-7820X - 32 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-7820X doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €622.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8673 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
199
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.69/FPS
100%
Price, €
€534.6
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €534.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8948 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-7820X | vs | Core i9-13900K |
---|---|---|
Jun 26th, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake-E/EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 24 |
16 | Threads | 32 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |