Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-12100F outperforms the more expensive Core i7-7820X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-12100F is 1674 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-7820X.
Advantages of Core i7-7820X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-12100F - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 10% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Core i7-7820X - 274 vs 249 FPS
- Up to 86% cheaper than Core i7-7820X - €87.90 vs €622.15
- Up to 87% better value when playing FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Core i7-7820X - €0.32 vs €2.50 per FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Core i7-7820X - 58 vs 140 Watts
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for €622.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7113 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
274
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.32/FPS
100%
Price, €
€87.9
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €87.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7388 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-7820X | vs | Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Jun 26th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Skylake-E/EP | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 58 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |