Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms Core i7-720QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 4507 days newer than Core i7-720QM.
Advantages of Core i7-720QM
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i3-12100F - 45 vs 58 Watts
Advantages of Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 71% better in Starfield than Core i7-720QM - 72 vs 42 FPS
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
72
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.13/FPS
100%
Price, €
€81.33
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €81.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 241 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Sep 23rd, 2009
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-720QM | vs | Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Sep 23rd, 2009 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Clarksfield | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
1.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
2.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 58 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
12.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |