The Core i7-6700T is the comparison's loser – it's a slower gaming CPU than the Core i3-10105F and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's €96.95 more expensive!
Advantages of the Core i7-6700T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Has an integrated GPU, while the Core i3-10105F cannot run games without a dedicated GPU
Advantages of the Core i3-10105F
- A faster CPU for gaming
- Up to 53% cheaper – €85.50 vs €182.45
- A much better value for money for gaming
Core i7-6700T vs Core i3-10105F for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i3-10105F
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
187
100%
Min 1% FPS
124
100%
Price, €
€85.5
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.45/FPS
100%
Core i7-6700T vs Core i3-10105F in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-6700T vs Core i3-10105F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-6700T vs Core i3-10105F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-6700T
Sep 1st, 2015
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
76%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
82%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
80%
Core i3-10105F
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
75%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-6700T | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i3-10105F |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| $303.00 | MSRP | $97.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
| Skylake | Codename | Comet Lake |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Performance | ||
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.7 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.4 GHz |
8 MB | L3 Cache | 6 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 @ 2133 MHz, DDR4 @ 2133 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2666 MHz |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | No |
| No | Overclockable | No |
