The Core i7-6700 is a clear winner – it's a faster gaming CPU than the Core i5-6400 and it's also a better value for money, as it's €91.45 cheaper!
Advantages of the Core i7-6700
- A faster CPU for gaming
- Up to 31% cheaper – €202.00 vs €293.45
- A better value for money for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of the Core i5-6400
The Core i7-6700 is better in every way
Core i7-6700 vs Core i5-6400 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-6700
Jul 1st, 2015
Average FPS
184
100%
Min 1% FPS
122
100%
Price, €
€202
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.09/FPS
100%
Core i5-6400
Jul 2nd, 2015
Average FPS
180
98%
Min 1% FPS
120
98%
Price, €
€293.45
68%
Value, €/FPS
€1.63/FPS
67%
Core i7-6700 vs Core i5-6400 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-6700 vs Core i5-6400 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-6700 vs Core i5-6400 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-6700
Jul 1st, 2015
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
100%
Core i5-6400
Jul 2nd, 2015
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
75%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
79%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
82%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-6700 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i5-6400 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Jul 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2015 |
$303.00 | MSRP | $182.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Skylake | Codename | Skylake |
65 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
Performance | ||
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.7 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.3 GHz |
8 MB | L3 Cache | 6 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR3 @ 2133 MHz, DDR4 @ 2133 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2133 MHz |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |